Logo

Value Betting vs Arbitrage Betting: Which Strategy Is Better?

Juanse BritoJuanse Brito·9 min read·
value bettingarbitragestrategycomparison
Share:

Two Paths to Profitable Betting

Value betting and arbitrage betting are the two primary strategies used by professional sports bettors. Both exploit inefficiencies in the betting market, but they work very differently and suit different types of bettors.

Value betting: Place single bets with positive expected value (+EV). Some bets lose, but over time, the mathematical edge generates profit.

Arbitrage betting: Bet all outcomes across different sportsbooks to guarantee profit regardless of result. Every bet profits, but margins are smaller.

Which is better? That depends on your capital, risk tolerance, time availability, and goals. Let's compare them head-to-head.

How Each Strategy Works

Value Betting Explained

You find bets where the sportsbook's odds underestimate the true probability of an outcome. These bets have positive expected value.

Example: You calculate a team has a 55% chance to win. The book offers +120 odds (implied 45.5% probability). Since 55% > 45.5%, this is a value bet.

Over hundreds of bets, the edge compounds into profit despite individual losses.

Arbitrage Betting Explained

You bet on all possible outcomes of an event at different sportsbooks, exploiting price discrepancies to guarantee profit.

Example:

  • Book A: Team X at +110 (2.10)
  • Book B: Team Y at +105 (2.05)

By staking $476 on Team X and $524 on Team Y ($1,000 total):

  • If X wins: $476 × 2.10 = $999.60 (profit after fees)
  • If Y wins: $524 × 2.05 = $1,074.20 (profit ~$74)

The combined implied probability is under 100%, creating guaranteed profit.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FactorValue BettingArbitrage Betting
Risk per betLoses sometimesAlways profits
Profit per betHigher (2-15%+ EV)Lower (1-5% typically)
VarianceHighNone
Capital neededLower ($1,000+)Higher ($5,000+)
Accounts needed5-10+10-20+
Time to limitingMonths-yearWeeks-months
Time commitmentMediumHigh
Emotional difficultyHigher (losing streaks)Lower (consistent)
Long-term ROIHigher potentialMore consistent
ComplexityMediumMedium-high

Risk and Variance

Arbitrage: Low Risk

Each arbitrage bet profits. Your only risks are:

  • One leg failing (odds change before you place second bet)
  • Bet voiding (book cancels due to "error")
  • Getting limited quickly

Day-to-day, your balance grows steadily. No losing streaks exist because you can't lose a properly executed arb.

Value Betting: Higher Risk

Individual value bets lose regularly. A +5% EV bet still loses 45-48% of the time. You will experience:

  • Multiple losing days in a row
  • Losing weeks or even months
  • Bankroll swings of 10-20%+

The edge manifests over hundreds or thousands of bets, not each bet. This variance is mathematically normal but emotionally challenging.

Verdict: Arbitrage is "safer" day-to-day. Value betting requires accepting short-term variance for higher long-term returns.

Profit Potential

Arbitrage Returns

Typical arb margins: 1-5% per bet

Monthly returns (with $10,000 capital):

  • Active capital deployed: ~$2,000-3,000 daily average
  • 10 arbs/day at 2% average: $40-60/day
  • Monthly: $1,000-1,500

ROI on active capital: 15-25% monthly ROI on total capital: 10-15% monthly

Returns decline as accounts get limited.

Value Betting Returns

Typical EV: 2-10%+ per bet

Monthly returns (with $5,000 bankroll):

  • 200 bets/month at 3% average EV
  • Half Kelly staking
  • Expected: $300-500/month

ROI on bankroll: 6-10% monthly

Returns can increase with experience and sustained positive CLV.

Verdict: Value betting has higher theoretical returns, but arbitrage is more predictable. For risk-adjusted returns, they're closer than they appear.

Capital Requirements

Arbitrage: High Capital Needed

You need capital distributed across 10-20+ sportsbooks because:

  • Both sides must be bet simultaneously
  • Money is locked until settlement
  • Each book needs enough to stake its side

Recommended: $5,000-15,000 starting capital

With $2,000 total, you'd have ~$100-200 per book, too small for meaningful arbing.

Value Betting: Lower Capital Needed

You bet at one book at a time, so capital concentration is fine. Proper bankroll management works with smaller amounts.

Recommended: $1,000-5,000 starting bankroll

Even $500 can work if you use strict fractional Kelly.

Verdict: Value betting is more accessible for those with less starting capital.

Account Longevity

Arbitrage: Fast Limiting

Sportsbooks detect arbing patterns quickly:

  • You only bet when odds diverge
  • You bet precise calculated amounts
  • You bet both sides within minutes

Most recreational books limit arbers within 2-8 weeks of aggressive activity.

Value Betting: Slower Limiting

Value bettors are harder to identify:

  • Single bets, not obviously coordinated
  • Could look like lucky recreational bettor
  • Pattern emerges more slowly

Most accounts last 3-6 months with moderate value betting, sometimes longer with good camouflage.

Verdict: Value betting accounts last significantly longer, preserving your betting infrastructure.

Time Commitment

Arbitrage: Time-Intensive

Arbing requires:

  • Constant monitoring for opportunities
  • Fast execution (seconds matter)
  • Managing 10-20+ accounts
  • Rebalancing funds between books
  • Tracking many simultaneous bets

Active arbers spend 2-4+ hours daily.

Value Betting: More Flexible

Value betting allows:

  • Checking software periodically
  • Placing bets when convenient
  • Less account management
  • Automated tracking

Active value bettors spend 30 minutes to 2 hours daily.

Verdict: Value betting is more time-efficient and lifestyle-friendly.

Emotional and Psychological Factors

Arbitrage: Emotionally Easier

Every bet profits. You don't experience:

  • Losing streaks
  • Questioning your strategy
  • FOMO on missed opportunities
  • Despair during downturns

The main stress is execution (will both legs go through?) and watching accounts get limited.

Value Betting: Emotionally Challenging

You will lose many bets. During downswings:

  • Doubt creeps in
  • Temptation to increase stakes
  • Harder to stay disciplined
  • Need to trust the math

Success requires emotional resilience and faith in long-term expected value.

Verdict: Arbitrage is psychologically simpler. Value betting requires mental discipline.

Which Sports Work Best?

For Arbitrage:

  1. Tennis (most opportunities, fast lines)
  2. Soccer (global book diversity)
  3. Basketball (NBA/NCAAB)
  4. Baseball (moneylines)
  5. Hockey

For Value Betting:

  1. NFL/NCAAF (most analyzed, but still has edge)
  2. NBA/NCAAB (high volume)
  3. Soccer (European leagues)
  4. Tennis (fast markets)
  5. Props across all sports

Verdict: Tennis and soccer dominate arbitrage. Value betting works across all major sports.

Combining Both Strategies

Many successful bettors use both simultaneously.

Benefits of combining:

  1. Diversification: Arbitrage provides consistent base income while value betting offers growth
  2. Account camouflage: Arb winnings fund recreational-looking bets
  3. Capital efficiency: Move money between strategies as opportunities arise
  4. Reduced account suspicion: Mixed betting patterns look less sharp

How to combine:

  • Use 60% of capital for value betting (longer account life)
  • Use 40% for arbitrage (consistent income)
  • When arb accounts get limited, shift capital to value betting
  • Use arb profits to fund value betting bankroll

Practical allocation ($10,000 total):

  • $6,000 bankroll for value betting across 8 books
  • $4,000 distributed for arbitrage across 12 books
  • Rebalance monthly based on limiting and opportunities

Decision Framework: Which Should You Choose?

Choose Arbitrage If:

  • You have $5,000+ to start
  • You can monitor opportunities throughout the day
  • You prefer guaranteed returns over higher potential
  • You handle execution pressure well
  • You're okay with accounts lasting only weeks-months
  • You want minimal emotional variance

Choose Value Betting If:

  • You have $1,000-5,000 to start
  • You have limited time (evenings, weekends)
  • You want higher long-term returns
  • You can handle losing streaks emotionally
  • You want accounts to last longer
  • You're comfortable with statistical variance

Choose Both If:

  • You have $10,000+ to start
  • You want diversified income streams
  • You can manage complexity
  • You're building toward full-time betting

Real-World Scenarios

Scenario 1: College Student

  • Capital: $1,500
  • Time: Evenings only
  • Goal: Side income

Recommendation: Value betting. Lower capital requirement, flexible time, accounts last longer.

Scenario 2: Full-Time Professional

  • Capital: $30,000
  • Time: All day
  • Goal: Primary income

Recommendation: Both. Use arbitrage for consistent base income, value betting for growth. Rotate books aggressively.

Scenario 3: Working Professional

  • Capital: $5,000
  • Time: 1 hour/day
  • Goal: Supplemental income

Recommendation: Value betting primarily, with light arbitrage on weekends. Time constraints favor less active monitoring.

Scenario 4: Risk-Averse Investor

  • Capital: $10,000
  • Time: Flexible
  • Goal: Steady returns, minimal risk

Recommendation: Arbitrage. Guaranteed returns match your risk profile despite faster limiting.

Long-Term Sustainability

Arbitrage Long-Term:

Viable for 6-18 months intensively. As accounts get limited:

  • Open new books as available
  • Move to sharp-friendly books (Pinnacle, exchanges)
  • Returns decline as options narrow

Eventually, you'll run out of fresh recreational books.

Value Betting Long-Term:

Sustainable indefinitely with proper management:

  • Accounts last longer, so infrastructure persists
  • New books can be added over time
  • Sharp-friendly books accept value bettors
  • Skills improve, edge potentially increases

Long-term career potential is higher with value betting.

Verdict: Value betting has better long-term sustainability. Arbitrage is more of a time-limited opportunity.

Key Takeaways

Value Betting:

  • Higher potential returns (5-20%+ monthly on bankroll)
  • Requires emotional discipline for variance
  • Lower capital requirement ($1,000+)
  • Accounts last longer (months-year)
  • More time-flexible
  • Better long-term sustainability

Arbitrage Betting:

  • Guaranteed profit per bet (no variance)
  • Requires fast execution and monitoring
  • Higher capital requirement ($5,000+)
  • Accounts limited faster (weeks-months)
  • More time-intensive
  • Best as medium-term income source

Neither is universally "better." The right choice depends on your capital, time, risk tolerance, and goals.

For most bettors starting out, value betting is the more practical entry point due to lower capital requirements and longer account lifespans. As you build capital, adding arbitrage creates a diversified approach.


Ready to start? Bet Hero supports both strategies:

Juanse Brito
Juanse BritoCEO & Co-Founder at Bet Hero

Juan Sebastian Brito is the CEO and Co-Founder of Bet Hero, a sports betting analytics platform used by thousands of bettors to find +EV opportunities and arbitrage. With a background in software engineering and computer science from FIB (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya), he built Bet Hero to bring data-driven, mathematically-proven betting strategies to the mainstream. His work focuses on probability theory, real-time odds analysis, and building tools that give bettors a quantifiable edge.

View all articles →

Put this into practice

Bet Hero scans 400+ sportsbooks in real-time to find +EV bets and arbitrage opportunities so you don't have to.